Previous Page  211 / 304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 211 / 304 Next Page
Page Background

47. Dealing with Human Sacrifice

Once again, I was very impressed with the

comments and elaboration my son made on the written

essay text portion of his medical school application:

When I was born, abortion was illegal in most

states. There wasn't much information available

about the circumstances of my birth, but I have

to wonder if I would exist today, had I been

conceived in the 1980's or the 1990's. I have a

very high regard for human life because of my

circumstances. I would like to give others what

has been given to me -- life. I have high moral

and ethical standards and a true interest in the

well-being of mankind. I intend to make it my

goal to help people gain mobility, battle against

needless suffering and premature death. As an

adopted child, I sense that my life's mission is to

pay back through a life of medical service, that

gift that was given to me many years ago.

Helen Westover was at one time a pro-choice

feminist. Writing in

AllAboutIssues,

she describes "the

hardest case of all," which has to deal with how the

pro-choice debate wounds _adoptees:

Every syllable of the pro-abortion rhetoric

wounds the adoptee. Many of us struggle with

feelings of low self-esteem due to abandonment

and rejection to which · we feel we were

subjected. When adoptees hear "choice-speak,"

· it cruelly reinforces all that self-doubt. Adoptees

are another group of people who are injured by

the pro-choice rhetoric. The Adopted People for

Life Organization encourages adoptees in general

to enter the pro-life struggle because it is our

struggle. Our pre-born brothers and sisters, who

in a saner time would have been adopted, are

193